Remember when Democrats repeated over and over that "Nobody is above the law". Even though Democrat run cities ignore federal immigration laws and provide sanctuary to people breaking our immigration laws? Yeeeeah its different when they do it.
Well now the media is trying to set up a narrative that Democrats are above the law because if you accuse them of corruption, it's because the Russians did it. I kid you not, they are seriously suggesting that if you think Joe Biden might be corrupt, its because Russians have somehow planted that thought in your brain. It's not that Biden is on video bragging about a quid pro quo that involved firing the prosecutor who was investigating the corrupt Ukrainian energy company that his son was inexplicably a board member of….This latest attempt to steal the election is similar to what they when DNC servers were hacked, exposing corruption at the DNC and coordination with the media. They buried the stories, saying it was unfair because Russians.
In case you need to be brought up to speed, the election is only legitimate if Democrats win it because Russians and Democrats cant be investigated for corruption because Russians.
So, this all started with a supposed hack on Burisma, the company Biden's son was a board member of, by the Russians. The New York times broke this story, citing findings made by a cyber security company called Area 1.
Unsurprisingly, Democrats are taking their cue and are now trying to frame any negative news or legitimate questions about Biden as Russian interference.
Now this is where it gets interesting…. Things not mentioned in the New York Times article…
- The company that supposedly caught this hack on Burisma, Area 1, was started by a former employee of Crowdstrike. You'll remember, Crowdstrike was the company that certified the DNC was hacked by Russia, but never did allow the FBI to investigate the server.
- According to Brietbart.com, Area 1 has been hired by most of the Democrat presidential candidates, or that it's funded by a technology venture capital firm whose employees are Democrat donors.
- Area 1 is partnered with Google and Crowdstrike was funded by google's parent company.
- Area 1's co founder is a clearly a Democrat who supports Democrats, according to his twitter feed. Besides that he's donated to Warren's and Booker's campaign
According to Breitbart:
"Falkowitz is an expert for the annual RSA Conference on cybersecurity where Dmitri Alperovitch, CrowdStrike’s co-founder and Chief Technology Officer, serves on the advisory board. Area 1 participates annually in the RSA Conference alongside CrowdStrike’s Alperovitch."
"CrowdStrike was financed to the tune of $100 million from a funding drive last year led by Google Capital. Google Capital, which now goes by the name of CapitalG, is an arm of Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company. Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Alphabet, has been a staunch and active supporter of Hillary Clinton and is a longtime donor to the Democratic Party.
Area 1, meanwhile, partnered with Google to become Google’s Cloud Technology Partner for Security.
A major Area 1 investor is Kleiner Perkins , who’s employees give overwhelmingly to Democrats."
So clearly, there this security company and the Democrats have a lot to gain by fear mongering about this Russian bogyman. My first question is, what are they afraid of? If they're so squeaky clean and nobody is above the law, what's the problem? It certainly seems like they has something to be afraid of.
One thing that really bothers me is reading the comments in the New York Times article. These people are convinced that Democrats can do no wrong and if someone suggests wrong, they're a Russia loving traitor to America. The comments are filled with hate for Republicans, calling them a "threat" to this country. What bothers me is what will happen if these people get power. Something I've repeated for years is, these people are dangerous because of their propensity to rationalize.
Who knows what these people could do to their fellow American and rationalize it as "defending democracy". We already see them using social media to crush their political opposition through censorship and other underhanded tactics. They rationalize it all by simply demonizing and broadly generalizing their opposition as racist monsters.